<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Answering NonBeliever</title>
	<atom:link href="http://answeringnonbeliever.info/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://answeringnonbeliever.info</link>
	<description>Things That Need To Be Answered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:48:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wafa Sultan, Just Another Liar by admin</title>
		<link>http://answeringnonbeliever.info/wafa-sultan-just-another-liar.html/comment-page-1#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://answeringnonbeliever.info/?p=7#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Hi Abdullah thank you for informing me about Bassam&#039;s new site and I have added it to the article</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Abdullah thank you for informing me about Bassam&#8217;s new site and I have added it to the article</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wafa Sultan, Just Another Liar by Abdullah</title>
		<link>http://answeringnonbeliever.info/wafa-sultan-just-another-liar.html/comment-page-1#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Abdullah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 07:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://answeringnonbeliever.info/?p=7#comment-18</guid>
		<description>It is best if you direct people to his new site http://www.call-to-monotheism.com/wafa__sultan_s_lies_refuted</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is best if you direct people to his new site <a href="http://www.call-to-monotheism.com/wafa__sultan_s_lies_refuted" rel="nofollow">http://www.call-to-monotheism.com/wafa__sultan_s_lies_refuted</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FaithFreedom Org Evolves To Be Christian Site and Answering A Christian Stupid Babble by admin</title>
		<link>http://answeringnonbeliever.info/faithfreedom-org-evolves-to-be-christian-site-and-answering-a-christian-stupid-babble.html/comment-page-1#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 14:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://answeringnonbeliever.info/?p=3#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Ibn Kamuna runs away...pathetic!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ibn Kamuna runs away&#8230;pathetic!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FaithFreedom Org Evolves To Be Christian Site and Answering A Christian Stupid Babble by Was Prophet Muhammad Wrong For Killing Ka’ab bin Al Ashraf? &#124; Answering NonBeliever</title>
		<link>http://answeringnonbeliever.info/faithfreedom-org-evolves-to-be-christian-site-and-answering-a-christian-stupid-babble.html/comment-page-1#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Was Prophet Muhammad Wrong For Killing Ka’ab bin Al Ashraf? &#124; Answering NonBeliever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 05:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://answeringnonbeliever.info/?p=3#comment-9</guid>
		<description>[...] Kamunna imagination of prophet Muhammad to be a merciless killer, I have before proved him wrong in Faithfreedom.org evolves to be Christian site and put him in disparate situation on not being able refute my arguments there, thus to make a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kamunna imagination of prophet Muhammad to be a merciless killer, I have before proved him wrong in Faithfreedom.org evolves to be Christian site and put him in disparate situation on not being able refute my arguments there, thus to make a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FaithFreedom Org Evolves To Be Christian Site and Answering A Christian Stupid Babble by admin</title>
		<link>http://answeringnonbeliever.info/faithfreedom-org-evolves-to-be-christian-site-and-answering-a-christian-stupid-babble.html/comment-page-1#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 04:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://answeringnonbeliever.info/?p=3#comment-8</guid>
		<description>By the way your:

http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/index.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=2110

Already responded here if you want to read:

http://answeringnonbeliever.info/the-killing-of-abu-%e2%80%98afak-and-the-killing-of-asma.html

And another accusation of yours:

http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/index.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=2217

Already responded too:

http://answeringnonbeliever.info/was-prophet-muhammad-wrong-for-killing-ka%e2%80%99ab-bin-al-ashraf.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way your:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/index.php?name=News&#038;file=article&#038;sid=2110" rel="nofollow">http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/index.php?name=News&#038;file=article&#038;sid=2110</a></p>
<p>Already responded here if you want to read:</p>
<p><a href="http://answeringnonbeliever.info/the-killing-of-abu-%e2%80%98afak-and-the-killing-of-asma.html" rel="nofollow">http://answeringnonbeliever.info/the-killing-of-abu-%e2%80%98afak-and-the-killing-of-asma.html</a></p>
<p>And another accusation of yours:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/index.php?name=News&#038;file=article&#038;sid=2217" rel="nofollow">http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/index.php?name=News&#038;file=article&#038;sid=2217</a></p>
<p>Already responded too:</p>
<p><a href="http://answeringnonbeliever.info/was-prophet-muhammad-wrong-for-killing-ka%e2%80%99ab-bin-al-ashraf.html" rel="nofollow">http://answeringnonbeliever.info/was-prophet-muhammad-wrong-for-killing-ka%e2%80%99ab-bin-al-ashraf.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FaithFreedom Org Evolves To Be Christian Site and Answering A Christian Stupid Babble by admin</title>
		<link>http://answeringnonbeliever.info/faithfreedom-org-evolves-to-be-christian-site-and-answering-a-christian-stupid-babble.html/comment-page-1#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 04:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://answeringnonbeliever.info/?p=3#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Dear Ibn Kammuna

Sorry for the word, I shouldn&#039;t have said that. But I am not the only rude person here, you too:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ibn Kamunna:&lt;/strong&gt;
The so-called scholars of Islam encourage this &lt;strong&gt;sharade of idiocy&lt;/strong&gt; through their writings&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So you hate to be insulted while you are freely to insult anyone, you&#039;re so infidel you know that? But as I am Muslim I am sorry for my word.

But my stance already clear that I am here to questioning you concerning your incorrect argument for the failure of prophet Muhammad to fulfill the biblical prophecy, so we discuss this first and you are obligated to defend your argument, afterward we can step ahead to your issue to disprove your accusations.

Your words:

&lt;blockquote&gt;I talk about other religions only when some Islamic “intellectual” makes unwarranted claims, just like what Mr. Badawi did.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So here I am to talk about your baseless argument.

Prove me wrong and don&#039;t run please.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Ibn Kammuna</p>
<p>Sorry for the word, I shouldn&#8217;t have said that. But I am not the only rude person here, you too:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Ibn Kamunna:</strong><br />
The so-called scholars of Islam encourage this <strong>sharade of idiocy</strong> through their writings</p></blockquote>
<p>So you hate to be insulted while you are freely to insult anyone, you&#8217;re so infidel you know that? But as I am Muslim I am sorry for my word.</p>
<p>But my stance already clear that I am here to questioning you concerning your incorrect argument for the failure of prophet Muhammad to fulfill the biblical prophecy, so we discuss this first and you are obligated to defend your argument, afterward we can step ahead to your issue to disprove your accusations.</p>
<p>Your words:</p>
<blockquote><p>I talk about other religions only when some Islamic “intellectual” makes unwarranted claims, just like what Mr. Badawi did.</p></blockquote>
<p>So here I am to talk about your baseless argument.</p>
<p>Prove me wrong and don&#8217;t run please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FaithFreedom Org Evolves To Be Christian Site and Answering A Christian Stupid Babble by Ibn Kammuna</title>
		<link>http://answeringnonbeliever.info/faithfreedom-org-evolves-to-be-christian-site-and-answering-a-christian-stupid-babble.html/comment-page-1#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Ibn Kammuna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 03:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://answeringnonbeliever.info/?p=3#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Dear Sir,
It is clear you are not up to debating Islam and Muhammad&#039;s personna. The above article discusses Dr. Badawi&#039;s claims, not yours. When he contacts me or FFI, I will debate him. 
Also, you have called me &quot;Stupid&quot; twice. Once in your previous comment. And once in the title of your article. Hence, you are a rude person.
Now, My articles discuss Islam, because Islam spells &quot;EVIL&quot; to me. I have no quarrel with any other religion, be it Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism, Buddhism,..etc. I am not going to discuss anything but Islam and Islam&#039;s claims. I talk about other religions only when some Islamic &quot;intellectual&quot; makes unwarranted claims, just like what Mr. Badawi did.
Finally, Because you are rude, I will not leave any more comments on this blog for you. However, my invitation for a debate is still open. But, you&#039;ll have to contact FFI editors and go through them, and they will relay your message to me. I doubt it though. You are not debate material. You are just some rude person trying to hang onto a sixth century Arabian barbarity.
Have a good weekend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Sir,<br />
It is clear you are not up to debating Islam and Muhammad&#8217;s personna. The above article discusses Dr. Badawi&#8217;s claims, not yours. When he contacts me or FFI, I will debate him.<br />
Also, you have called me &#8220;Stupid&#8221; twice. Once in your previous comment. And once in the title of your article. Hence, you are a rude person.<br />
Now, My articles discuss Islam, because Islam spells &#8220;EVIL&#8221; to me. I have no quarrel with any other religion, be it Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism, Buddhism,..etc. I am not going to discuss anything but Islam and Islam&#8217;s claims. I talk about other religions only when some Islamic &#8220;intellectual&#8221; makes unwarranted claims, just like what Mr. Badawi did.<br />
Finally, Because you are rude, I will not leave any more comments on this blog for you. However, my invitation for a debate is still open. But, you&#8217;ll have to contact FFI editors and go through them, and they will relay your message to me. I doubt it though. You are not debate material. You are just some rude person trying to hang onto a sixth century Arabian barbarity.<br />
Have a good weekend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FaithFreedom Org Evolves To Be Christian Site and Answering A Christian Stupid Babble by admin</title>
		<link>http://answeringnonbeliever.info/faithfreedom-org-evolves-to-be-christian-site-and-answering-a-christian-stupid-babble.html/comment-page-1#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 03:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://answeringnonbeliever.info/?p=3#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Dear Ibn Kamunna, 

If you follow my above article carefully, you will find that it&#039;s not the evil titles you give toward prophet Muhammad (pbuh) that I talk about, but it&#039;s about your own &lt;b&gt;stupid&lt;/b&gt; argument. In your Article, you claim that Muhammad can&#039;t be the awaited savior of Deut 18:!8, because he was an assassin, looter and robbers while those kind of things don&#039;t against your own Biblical teaching, instead it&#039;s widely known that your OT (Old Testament) promotes any mean of mass-killing which have made OT prophets and God in OT to be the most ruthless, merciless and ferocious killers and robbers, so you better answer me on this matter rather than suggesting to discuss something that I don&#039;t talk about. For me, if there is a reason for prophet Muhammad&#039;s failure to fulfilled the prophecy in OT, it&#039;s because he was not as cruel as your Bible has dictated.

Regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Ibn Kamunna, </p>
<p>If you follow my above article carefully, you will find that it&#8217;s not the evil titles you give toward prophet Muhammad (pbuh) that I talk about, but it&#8217;s about your own <b>stupid</b> argument. In your Article, you claim that Muhammad can&#8217;t be the awaited savior of Deut 18:!8, because he was an assassin, looter and robbers while those kind of things don&#8217;t against your own Biblical teaching, instead it&#8217;s widely known that your OT (Old Testament) promotes any mean of mass-killing which have made OT prophets and God in OT to be the most ruthless, merciless and ferocious killers and robbers, so you better answer me on this matter rather than suggesting to discuss something that I don&#8217;t talk about. For me, if there is a reason for prophet Muhammad&#8217;s failure to fulfilled the prophecy in OT, it&#8217;s because he was not as cruel as your Bible has dictated.</p>
<p>Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FaithFreedom Org Evolves To Be Christian Site and Answering A Christian Stupid Babble by Ibn Kammuna</title>
		<link>http://answeringnonbeliever.info/faithfreedom-org-evolves-to-be-christian-site-and-answering-a-christian-stupid-babble.html/comment-page-1#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Ibn Kammuna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 23:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://answeringnonbeliever.info/?p=3#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Dear Mulim,

Muhammad was an assassin. He assassinated people. . Now, lets narrow things down: I am willing to debate you and show you that Muhammad was indeed an assassin. This evil doing of his can be proven with no doubt to all readers. Prove me wrong. If you agree to debate this matter, I will contact FFI.org to publish our debate.
When done with assassinations, we can debate other things. For instance, Muhammad was a Mass murderer, and an ugly one indeed. We can debate this after the assassination debate. 
You can try to defend Islam as much as you want. It will still stink, and I will show you that in my debates.
The only sources I will rely on is the Qur&#039;an, Hadith and Sirat. I think this is a fair game. Are you up to the challenge? 
We can send our emails to FFI. I&#039;ll arrange with Dr. Sina and the editors that they forward your rebuttals to me and I&#039;ll forward my response with your rebuttal to FFI for publication. The format I see is this:
1. I&#039;ll send you, through FFI why I believe Muhammad was an assassin. 
2. FFI will forward that to you.
3. you forward my email and your rebuttal to it to FFI
4. FFI will publish all that is written
5. I will write a final response and send to FFI who will forward to you
6. You write your final response and send all to FFI
7. FFI will publish all
8. we will leave it to the readers to comment and tell who was truthful and correct, or not.
You can publish the debate on other sites too, with no changes, just like FFI,

Are you up to the challenge? Are you willing to face reality?

Here is a link to open you appetite:

http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/index.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=2217

and

http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/index.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=2110

Peace</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mulim,</p>
<p>Muhammad was an assassin. He assassinated people. . Now, lets narrow things down: I am willing to debate you and show you that Muhammad was indeed an assassin. This evil doing of his can be proven with no doubt to all readers. Prove me wrong. If you agree to debate this matter, I will contact FFI.org to publish our debate.<br />
When done with assassinations, we can debate other things. For instance, Muhammad was a Mass murderer, and an ugly one indeed. We can debate this after the assassination debate.<br />
You can try to defend Islam as much as you want. It will still stink, and I will show you that in my debates.<br />
The only sources I will rely on is the Qur&#8217;an, Hadith and Sirat. I think this is a fair game. Are you up to the challenge?<br />
We can send our emails to FFI. I&#8217;ll arrange with Dr. Sina and the editors that they forward your rebuttals to me and I&#8217;ll forward my response with your rebuttal to FFI for publication. The format I see is this:<br />
1. I&#8217;ll send you, through FFI why I believe Muhammad was an assassin.<br />
2. FFI will forward that to you.<br />
3. you forward my email and your rebuttal to it to FFI<br />
4. FFI will publish all that is written<br />
5. I will write a final response and send to FFI who will forward to you<br />
6. You write your final response and send all to FFI<br />
7. FFI will publish all<br />
8. we will leave it to the readers to comment and tell who was truthful and correct, or not.<br />
You can publish the debate on other sites too, with no changes, just like FFI,</p>
<p>Are you up to the challenge? Are you willing to face reality?</p>
<p>Here is a link to open you appetite:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/index.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=2217" rel="nofollow">http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/index.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=2217</a></p>
<p>and</p>
<p><a href="http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/index.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=2110" rel="nofollow">http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/index.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=2110</a></p>
<p>Peace</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FaithFreedom Org Evolves To Be Christian Site and Answering A Christian Stupid Babble by admin</title>
		<link>http://answeringnonbeliever.info/faithfreedom-org-evolves-to-be-christian-site-and-answering-a-christian-stupid-babble.html/comment-page-1#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 17:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://answeringnonbeliever.info/?p=3#comment-3</guid>
		<description>@Ibnu Kamuna FFI.ORG (sorry in the article I wrote .COM) doesn&#039;t really against hate, it promotes it instead. There are uncounted articles there filled with garbage, prejudices, hatred and lies. Do you think all people don&#039;t know with what you and your cheerleaders wrote there and do you think your readers are fool as you are? The above article is one of many examples found how stupid FFI.ORG authors can be, one of which is you are as the author of this article, for using arguments that certainly go against you.

By publishing your article (I doubt you&#039;re real Ibn Kamuna) FFI.ORG has proven to be facilitator of Christians and Christianity, just like other Christians apologetic sites that serve the same purpose, this is undeniable fact. Faithfreedom.org is Christian site...face it!

FFI.Org is not place for honest mind and for people to learn, but it&#039;s place for haters to gather to compete to each others to discover which one gives the vilest mock against Islam,...But I still admit I found something there...though covered by dirty words.

And about your satirical article within your link, perhaps I would do the same with your &lt;del datetime=&quot;2009-05-01T15:52:32+00:00&quot;&gt;un&lt;/del&gt;holy  Bible, but I am not going down my self that low.


Regards

Mulim

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ibnu Kamuna FFI.ORG (sorry in the article I wrote .COM) doesn&#8217;t really against hate, it promotes it instead. There are uncounted articles there filled with garbage, prejudices, hatred and lies. Do you think all people don&#8217;t know with what you and your cheerleaders wrote there and do you think your readers are fool as you are? The above article is one of many examples found how stupid FFI.ORG authors can be, one of which is you are as the author of this article, for using arguments that certainly go against you.</p>
<p>By publishing your article (I doubt you&#8217;re real Ibn Kamuna) FFI.ORG has proven to be facilitator of Christians and Christianity, just like other Christians apologetic sites that serve the same purpose, this is undeniable fact. Faithfreedom.org is Christian site&#8230;face it!</p>
<p>FFI.Org is not place for honest mind and for people to learn, but it&#8217;s place for haters to gather to compete to each others to discover which one gives the vilest mock against Islam,&#8230;But I still admit I found something there&#8230;though covered by dirty words.</p>
<p>And about your satirical article within your link, perhaps I would do the same with your <del datetime="2009-05-01T15:52:32+00:00">un</del>holy  Bible, but I am not going down my self that low.</p>
<p>Regards</p>
<p>Mulim</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
